Preznit #43 Highly Praised By Comedian Helen Hong On 10/20/2017 Airing Of The Stephanie Miller Show

The following is an excerpt from the Stephanie Miller Show (Friday 10/20/2017) in which executive producer Vanessa Rumbles, live in-studio guest Helen Hong and Stephanie Miller discuss a 10/19/2017 speech by former preznit George W bush. This was a speech in which gwb voiced criticisms of current predisent Donald Trump... without naming him (George W Bush condemns bigotry and lies in coded attack on Trump).

Vanessa Rumbles: He wrote the speech himself...

Helen Hong: No.

Vanessa Rumbles: ...and everyone around him told him that it might be interpreted as him talking bad about Trump, and he didn't care.

Helen Hong: I was just thinking about this. My block has a lot of dogs, so I see a lot of dog poop. If you see dog poop that's been sitting there for awhile and it's kind of dried out, it's less offensive than fresh dog poop.

Stephanie Miller: That's true. That's a very good analogy. George Bush is old dried out dog poop. You can't even smell it anymore.

Helen Hong: It's been sitting in the sun. It's dehydrated. It's harmless. And now, next to a steaming fresh pile...

Stephanie Miller: Steaming, fresh orange pile. It doesn't seem so bad.

Helen Hong: Well, I'm a poet.

(Video: gwb speech "Bigotry in any form is blasphemy". Referred to by Politico as a speech on Trumpism).

"Bigotry seems emboldened" the former preznit says. "Seems"? He acknowledges the obvious, at least. Something most Republican politicians aren't doing. Flake and Corker being the only other two I can think of. There might be others, although they remain largely complicit via their silence.

DSB #76

Dotard Predisent Forgets Wife Is Standing Right Next To Him

The following video from Fort Myers Florida on 9/14/2017 where predisent Trump talked about Hurricane Irma rescue and relief efforts.

(Video: Mentally enfeebled old man forgets his wife is standing next to him).

Trump defenders say this is "fake news". "Trump is clearly aware she is there and is talking about himself and Melania seeing the devastation in person" according to Maarten Schenk's "hoax alert".

I don't know. He could have meant that Melania really wanted to be there - and that is why she was. On the other hand, Melania, instead of wearing her usual hot model/trophy wife clothing, has on a regular shirt, pants and baseball cap. I'm thinking he didn't recognize her.

DSB #75

Rich Republican A-Holes Who Think Poors Love It When Natural Disasters Wipe Them Out

Predisent Fart recently made some comments re Hurricane Harvey from a shelter in Houston that sounded familiar to me. In that they were 100 percent tone deaf. When it comes to natural disasters wiping out everything you own, it is a "wonderful thing" apparently. And Trump believed the victims were "really happy" and were having a "good time".

A somewhat similar comment was when former first lady Barbara Bush (when her doofus son was preznit and his administration flubbed the Hurricane Katrina response) said (in regards to the New Orleans refugees who were being housed in the Houston Astrodome) "so many of the people in the arena here, you know, were underprivileged anyway, so this, this is working very well for them". (9/5/2005).

Barbara Bush's comments were made "later that day [when] Mrs. Bush was a guest on Marketplace, a show on public radio". Audio below. (Source).

So, during Katrina the mother of Republican preznit George W bush said things were "working very well for them". Now, during Harvey the Republican predisent Donald Trump thinks everyone is having a "great time". Obviously it's not so bad to lose everything when you don't have much to being with. Heck, it can even work out very well (because some of the victims got a $2000 debit card). Or be so exciting that you end up having a great time (no debit cards, but you might get to meet THE Donald Trump!).

Transcript of Marketplace Barbara Bush audio: [Announcer] Houston, we may have a problem. [Barbara Bush] Almost everyone I've talked to said "we're going to move to Houston". [Announcer] Former 1st lady Barbara Bush took note of the mood in the small city that's formed inside Houston's astrodome. She said many simply want to stay put. [Barbara Bush] unintelligible ...scary is they all want to stay in Texas. Everybody is so overwhelmed by the hospitality. So many of the people in the arena here, you know, were underprivileged anyway... this is working very well for them.

DSB #74

Trump-Branded KKK Hoods For Sale In Trump Tower Gift Shop. Outrageous!

i maybe ruined this, but for a brief moment there were KKK hoods & piss proof sheets in the trump tower gift shop https://t.co/9Y15adfVve pic.twitter.com/oxifkCedMg

— Jake Offenhartz (@jangelooff) August 29, 2017

What does this mean? Looks like Trump is officially out of the KKKloset. Additionally, I found the following pic while surfing the net.

The one good thing that can be said of this picture is that the KKKmader-in-chief is wearing a tie of reasonable length (does not flow down to his crotch). I don't know when it was taken, or who took it, btw. It surely does not look good for Trump, though.

Other items for sale in the Trump Tower gift shop include pee-proof sheets and Russian flags. The sheets, I'm guessing, are for fans of "golden showers" (like Trump) and the flags for fans of Russia (trumpers appreciative of the help Putin provided to help Donald "win" the election).

"For fine people - show your pride" the packaging on the Trump-branded KKK hood says! He's not even pretending any longer! Yes, we've had racist presidents in the past, but this shit should not fly TODAY. Impeach!

Note: "appreciative" is a link to a pic of a trumpanzee holding up a "Thank you Russia" sign. Image posted to Reddit here. Looks real to me, although the Trump dancing with the KKK pic is (I'm guessing) photoshopped. And the Trump-branded KKK hood - as per the article I got the tweet from - says the merchandice is "satarical". Also placed there by "pranksters". Which is why this post is labeled "satire". All the links go to real articles, however. No fake news!

DSB #73

Rex Tillerson Confirms That Comments & Actions Of Predisent Fart Do Not Reflect American Values

That is my interpertation of what Sec of State Tillerson said in regards to predisent Fart, at least.

Given the fact that, if he did mean what he said, he would be speaking the truth. And I surely do not expect truthfulness from any Billionaire oligarch in the Fart Administration. Maybe Tillerson gaffed and accidentally told the truth?

Tillerson's words are from a Fox Nooz interview with Chris Wallace in which Trump's despicable Charlottesville comments (which earned condemnation from the UN) were the topic of discussion.

The following is from the 8/27/2017 airing of msnbc's Live with Alex Witt...

Audio Clip Begins...

Rex Tillerson: I don't believe that anyone doubts the American people's values or the commitment of the American government, or the government's agencies to advancing those values and defending those values.

Chris Wallace: And the president's values?

Rex Tillerson: The president speaks for himself, Chris.

Audio Clip Ends...

Alex Witt: In minutes, reactions to Secretary of State's Rex Tiller's comments when directly asked whether the president reflects American values.

Video: Fox News Sunday interview by Chris Wallace with ex-ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson from which MSNBC excerpted it's clip (my transcription above) (1:46, pub 8/27/2017).

DSB #72

The Antichrist Donald Trump Demands All People Accept The Mark Of The Beast

Soon Donald John Trump, the 3rd Antichrist as predicted by Nostradamus (after Napoleon and Hitler), will demand that citizens accept the Mark of the Beast. Not yet, but it is only a matter of time. First the False Prophet will appear.

Verse 12 [of Revelation] gives us the false prophet's mission on earth, which is to force humanity to worship the Antichrist [Donald Trump]. He has all the authority of the Antichrist because, like him, the false prophet is empowered by Satan. ...people will fall before them in adoration of their power and message. Verse 14 goes on to say the deception will be so great that the people will set up an idol to the Antichrist, "the image of the beast", and worship it. (Who is the false prophet of the end times?).

Obviously the PEOPLE who "fall before them in adoration" (the Antichrist DJT and the false prophet) are Trump followers. People who believe that anything negative about Trump in the media is fake news.

But things do not end well for the loyal and deluded trumpanzees. According to Revelation 14:9-10, "if anyone worships the beast and its image and receives its mark on their forehead or on their hand, they, too, will drink the wine of God's fury, which has been poured full strength into the cup of his wrath".

BTW, when I say that it a matter of time before DJT demands that people accept the Mark of the Beast, I mean IF DJT is the Antichrist. He might be. He might not be. I seriously don't know. And, how could I? Despite lies from another blogger regarding how I write about how Trump IS the Antichrist. I have never done so, and will never do so (the title of this post is troll bait).

Video: Breakthrough prophecy about Donald Trump from Mark of the Beast News! (12:37).

DSB #71

President Doofus #5

Welcome to the 5th entry in the "President Doofus" series. A series that concerns george w bush, the 43rd occupant of the White House. A pResident who was, incidentally, also illegitimate like the current one. That, and they're both idiots.

But Donald Trump is even dumber, unfortunately. Something that became apparent during the campaign. Which is why I stopped authoring posts putting down bush as a doofus. Because I'd actually consider taking him back now. If only to get rid of the current oval office resident.

A fact I was reminded of last weekend. Saturday Night Live re-aired an episode that was originally broadcast the day after Donald Trump ascended to the highest office in the land. By cheating, yes, but he is still pResident. Anyway, at the top of the show host Aziz Ansari said something positive about gwb, that YES, I had to admit was true.

Aziz Ansari: I think Trump should make a speech. A real speech, denouncing the lowercase KKK [people Ansari referred to earlier in his monologue as people who, now that Trump is president, no longer need to pretend they aren't racist]. Don't tweet about me being lame, or the show being lame. Write a speech. A real speech. Because these people are out there and it's pissing a lot of people off [that racists support Trump but Trump pretends they don't. WHILE dog whistling to them]. And I think it could make a real difference. Other presidents have done things like this and it has helped. Hate crimes and stuff went down. George W Bush made a speech after 9/11 and it really helped. Things changed. This is what he said in his speech - and I'm paraphrasing slightly - he said, "Islam is peace. The perpetrators of these attacks don't represent Islam. They represent war and violence. Our enemies are not our Muslim brothers and sisters. Our enemies are a network of radical terrorists". And everyone applauded. Republicans, Democrats - it didn't matter. Because it wasn't about politics. It's about basic human decency and remembering why the country was founded in the first place. I'm sitting there, watching that speech, and I'm like - what the hell has happened? I'm sitting here wistfully watching old George W Bush speeches? [Laughter]. Thinking - what a leader he was! 16 years ago I was certain this dude was a dildo, now I'm like - he guided us with his eloquence! [Laughter] (excerpted from Aziz Ansari's monologue, the 1/21/2017 airing of SNL, 6:31 to 7:65 of the 9:03 clip).

Was Aziz Ansari serious about Trump making such a speech, or was that just the set up to his gwb joke? I'm thinking the later, as Trump would never (and will never) make such a speech. I mean, given the fact that he ran on xenophobia (directed at Muslims and Hispanics). It is something his supporters love him for. They no longer have to pretend to not be racist. Racism now being OK according to the Orange Buffoon-in-Chief.

In any case, bush's speech following the attacks was the correct response. That was one instance when he stepped up and did a decent job. Unfortunately it was a calculated act to build goodwill so that the country would unite behind him, allowing him the freedom to first invade Afghanistan and later Iraq. Invading Iraq (a country that had nothing to do with 9/11) being something he dreamed of doing since day one of his presidency. Following the attacks he was likely thinking "Yes! Now I can invade Iraq!".

But he "guided us with his eloquence" with that one speech. Then went back to being a dildo. By demanding the Taliban turn over bin Laden then turning them down when they said yes. Then lying about Iraq having WMD.

The current White House resident "guiding us with his eloquence" to tamp down bigotry? That's something that will never happen. Love did not trump hate (one of HRC's campaign slogans). Instead the people wanted a Rightwing populist. A fact that still astounds me! Which isn't to say that gwb was not a doofus. He absolutely was. The point is that Trump is worse. Although he hasn't started any new wars... yet. He only ordered an illegal missile strike on a Syrian airfield.

But we could end up going to war. Either with North Korea, or Iran. I think it depends on whether or not it looks like he'll be impeached. Then he could wag the dog like crazy (with a full-blown war) in order to occupy the country and distract us all from removing him from office.

the Syrian airstike proving that the stupid American electorate likes it when potus does comander-in-chief stuff. Even though (I thought) people were tired of war. Maybe that was just when a Black guy was in charge. Although lobbing missiles into a country isn't the same as boots on the ground. But that could still happen. You know it's what neocons like Lindsay Graham and John McCain want.

DSB #70

Fake News Is Conditioning Minds For The Emergence Of The Antichrist, Donald Trump

This is according to Christian Conservative Daily. Although Evangelist Anita Fuentes doesn't say who the Man of sin (the Antichrist) is.

When Barack Obama was president, some Conservatives were convinced he was the AntiChrist. Charisma News reported on 8/7/2015 that "1 in 5 Republicans think Obama is the Antichrist [because] he is an pro-abortion activist and a pro-gay president who ushered same-sex marriage into the mainstream in his term". This is the "antichrist agenda". Even though the Bible does not say abortion is murder or that homosexuality is a sin.

But because it was fake news that helped Trump "win" the election, and because anything negative about Trump is labeled by followers as fake news, I say the Antichrist is Donald Trump. Or, if the Antichrist is on verge of appearing and fake news is paving the way for him, I think he could be Donald Trump. It is probably more likely that he isn't. But that so many people voted for a racist, anti-semitic reality show buffoon and sexual assaulter as president does give me pause. It's utterly ridiculous that this idiot is the leader of the free world.

Amyway, remember when Trump claimed that only he could fix it?

But Trump is uniquely unqualified, as President Obama noted. That he could fix "it" (whatever "it" may be - Washington, our Country, the world) is patently absurd. And, who the hell does Christian Conservative Daily (the evangelist in the video, people behind Christian Conservative Daily, readers of CCD) think "will appear to deceive humanity before the second coming of Jesus"?

It is Donald Trump who is in a position to deceive humanity (and has already deceived millions into voting for him)? So, could Donald Trump be the Antichrist? I am NOT saying I know for certain he is. In fact, he most likely is not. But I seriously think he could be. And that he COULD be is all I am saying (despite the title of my post).

DSB #69

Sean Spicer Says Jews Are #4 On List Of History's "Bad Guys"

Apparently he really doesn't like Jewish people.

So, according to Spicer "as far as bad guys go, the ranking is - boom, right up at the top, Hitler. Then Syria's Babar Al-Asshad. Three, I'm going to go pharaohs. And then I guess, chronologically, Jews take number 4".

The Pharaohs were bad guys because they enslaved the Jewish people, so why is it that Jewish people are #4 on the bad guy list, Sean? Proof, I think, that this administration is anti-semitic. I mean, firstly we have a White Nationalist in the position of Chief Advisor (Breitbart's Steve Bannon), now White House Press Secretary "apologizes" by naming Jews #4 of the all time Bad Guys? And he isn't immediately fired?

As far as Babar ruling Syria goes, I'm positive Sean is mistaken. Babar, being an elephant, was the ruler of the Elephant Land. A kingdom located in Southern Africa, not the Middle East! The ruler of Syria is named Bashar al-Assad (also, he is a human man not an elephant).

Image: Artist's rendering of King Babar (benevolent dictator of Elephant Land) and photograph of Bashar al-Assad (ruler of Syria and a bad guy).

DSB #68

Donald Trump To Start World War 3 On April 15, 2017

It's not me saying this, but the Conservative Horn News (although they do add the word "could").

Experts warn that Saturday, April 15th could mark the beginning of a series of events that has a tragic, history making outcome — World War 3. That's not hyperbole, folks. This weekend may be the closest the world will come to global war since the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1963. 200 foreign journalists currently covering North Korea's "Day of the Sun" celebration were warned to expect a "big and important event" Saturday. According to The New York Times, this "big event" is expected to be the country's sixth nuclear test. Experts fear the test could trigger an unstoppable series of events that finds the United States and China at war. "Such actions could trigger a U.S. military response", reporter Theodore Bunker wrote in Newsmax. Kim Jong Un has reportedly ordered the show of force to celebrate the 105th birthday of Kim Jong Un's grandfather, Kim Il Sung — and a U.S. military response is something foreign policy gurus from The National Interest warned would send the United States down an inevitable path to war. Tensions in the region have been building for weeks.Saturday, in response to recently escalating tensions on the Korean peninsula, Trump ordered Carrier Strike Group One and it's flagship aircraft carrier, the USS Carl Vinson, to move from Singapore to the Korean Sea. (Experts: World War 3 could start Apr. 15th. 4/13/2017, The Horn News).

The story goes on to note that "according to The Express, late Wednesday Kim Jong Un ordered the immediate evacuation of Pynongyang and, as of Thursday, North Korean authorities had already moved 25 percent of the capital's civilians out of the city".

Also, "hopefully, cooler heads prevail in North Korea". Cooler heads in North Korea? What about cooler heads in the White House? Sounds like the crazy fat kid who runs North Korea thinks the crazy fat old racist asshole US CIC may order a strike on North Korea's capital city.

Will WW3 be the result? I surely don't know, but obviously many people think it could. The Daily Mail reports "that searches for World War 3 hit their highest level since records started in 2004 this month".

Personally, I have been expecting Trump to fuck us all. All US citizens, of course. But (potentially) but the entire population of the world. Either war-wise or economically. So, YES, I think he could start WW3 in regards to North Korea. Apparently Trump supporters are enthusiastic about the prospect, however.

Image: Meme found at the top of the WYD blog. "Next" being a reference to Trump's illegal strike on a Syrian airfield (from which planes took off the next day). Assad was first and Kim Jong Un will be "next" (to be intimidated into behaving better by Trump).

DSB #67

Donald Trump Absolutely Is Hitler Reincarnated (154 Percent Certain)

You may be inclined to not believe me, but I think it's possible that Donald J. Trump might be Adolf Hitler reincarnated. Fact is, I Googled "Donald Trump Hitler Reincarnated" and RESULTS WERE RETURNED!! 70,900 results in 0.64 seconds, to be precise. And most of them said YES, Donald Trump IS Hitler reincarnated. The "evidence is damning" the very first result says. So there you go, proof positive that people are saying Trump is Hitler reincarnated. And based on "evidence" (as per the first Google result).

"No one wants to admit it but facts are facts" the opening sentence of the article says. Let that sink in for a minute. Facts Are Facts. Donald Trump IS Hitler reincarnated.

[A story in] the Philly Daily News... draws comparisons between... Donald Trump and Adolf Hitler. Trump was asked on CNN's "New Day" whether or not this comparison bothered him at all. Trump's response was a simple and emphatic, "No". ...digging just a bit deeper, what Trump was really trying to communicate with his "no" becomes shockingly clear: Trump was not bothered by this comparison to Hitler because he is Hitler reincarnated into a new, and even more terrifying, form. Why else would such a normally outspoken man, a man running for president of The United States no less, have absolutely no comment when compared to the most vilified figure in human history? (Is Donald Trump Hitler Reincarnated? The Evidence Is Damning by Joe Durbin. Carbonated TV).

Carbonated TV says "from the serious to the hilarious, we bring you stories that matter". So, would the "Trump is Hitler Reincarnated" story be an example of "the hilarious"? Clearly, NO. I mean, just look at the evidence the remainder of the story lays out and you, like me, will surely be convinced that Trump is Hitler back from the grave for another go-round at world domination.

For the record, I paged down to the bottom of the article and noticed that the article is tagged as "satire". Other tags include "humor" and "insane". However, as everyone knows, if satire is your goal, the writer needs to be crystal clear about it. A LARGE disclaimer before the "satire" beings that says "this is satire" (for example). And tags or lables at the end of a commentary do not count.

That is what a dumbass named Luke Spencer told me, in any case. And he was quite insistent about it. To claim "satire" by way of Labels or Tags is what Big Liars do. In order to walk back shit they don't want to stand by. Shit they absolutely meant seriously.

So Carbonated TV was being completely serious, as am I. In fact I take their assertion that Hitler has returned as Donald Trump 154 percent seriously. Your "serious percentage" might be higher or it might be lower, but it should NOT be below 100 unless you are a #trumpdupe. You're not a #trumpdupe, are you?

DSB #66

Donald Trump Not "Natural Born", Not A "Person" & Therefore Ineligible To Serve As POTUS

Someone posted a question on Quora that reads "Was Donald Trump really born in Zimbabwe?". What follows is an excerpt from the most up-voted answer.

Answer: I don't know for certain. But lately, lots of people are saying he was. The Celine Fnord Institute is currently funding a formal investigation. It's telling that, while he spent a good two years demanding Obama's birth certificate, we have asked and asked but Trump has never produced [his long form] birth certificate. Or his tax returns. Seems pretty fishy... what's he hiding? Ok, sure, Trump's trying to get off this by a technicality. Trump was born in 1946... perhaps in the British African state of Southern Rhodesia? They declared Independence as Rhodesia in 1965… Trump's folks would certainly have fled the end of white rule. The black nationals were using "Zimbabwe" in the early 60s... "Rhodesia" was a name derived from the name of British colonialist Cecil Rhodes. But now it's the independent state of Zimbabwe. Trump did say "If you have a date in Southern Rhodesia she'll be waiting in Zimbabwe" in season 5 of The Apprentice (Quora question answered by Dave Haynie).

Anyone can ask, and anyone can answer a question on Quora. Quora readers select the answer they like best and vote for it. Democracy in action, and in accordance with Stephen Colbert's "view that reality can be determined by consensus opinion".

"If a majority of people want something to be true, that thing therefore must become the truth" according to Colbert. This response, having received the most upvotes, is therefore obviously true. Although the question answer does say "I don't know for certain" although "lots of people are saying he was".

That is the KEY point, I believe. People are saying Trump was born in Zimbabwe. Josh Brown says he was. Masasi Hobho says Trump was born in Morgenster hospital in Masvingo, Zimbabwe.

If Barack Obama being born in Kenya made him ineligible to serve as POTUS (even though his mother was a United States citizen), then Donald Trump being born in Zimbabwe makes him ineligible. Even if his mother was a US citizen. Remember that Donald's father is an orangutan. Trump sued Bill Maher when he reveled this truth on air, but later dropped the matter (thereby admitting Maher was right).

Orangutans (as per Wikipedia) are the two exclusively Asian species of extant great apes... native to Indonesia and Malaysia". Zimbabwe is located in Southern Africa. My guess is that Donald Trump's was born in either Indonesia or Malaysia, then emigrated to Zimbabwe and later the United States. After marrying a human woman (Mary Anne Trump née MacLeod) with whom he fathered a human-orangutan hybrid they named Donald John.

Although Wikipedia notes that Frederick "Fred" Christ Trump was born in NY and his parents were born in Germany. The answer to this discrepancy? Obviously Fred Trump is not Donald's natural father. Maybe he believed he was (Mary Anne Trump fooled him into thinking Donald was his progeny) or maybe he conspired with his wife to hide Donald's true parentage.

In any case, the point is that, having been born in Zimbabwe, Trump is not eligible to serve as US president. Barack Obama, regardless of where he was born, served 2 full terms. However, while Barack Obama produced his Hawaiian birth certificate, Donald Trump has not. He (I believe) has thus far only released the short form and not the long form of his BC. Which, as you will recall, was not good enough when Obama did the same.

OBVIOUSLY Trump is not eligible. I mean, he is not even fully human! Surely I believe we can assume that the Founders intended only a 100% fully human individual to be eligible. That is in addition to being natural born and 35 years old (as per Article 2 of the US Constitution). Note that the Constitution uses the word "person", which dictionary.com defines as "a human being".

So, I think that Trump could be removed from office for not being a person (or fully a person) and for not being natural born. That's in addition to his wife Melania being a Russian spy (DSB #63).

DSB #65

Presidency Stolen From Rightful Winner HRC (Alex Mohajer Writing For HuffPo)

Alex Mohajer, writing for the Huffington Post, says "the evidence is clear. Hillary Clinton is the rightful president-elect". His reasoning? He agrees with Rep John Lewis (SWTD #369) that, if not for Putin's "influence campaign", HRC would have won. In addition Mohajer points to FBI director Comey's meddling; a violation of the Hatch Act (SWTD #356).

Another factor Mohajer and Lewis (apparently) overlook would be Kris Kobach's Interstate Crosscheck. A voter disenfranchisement election fraud scheme (DSD #54). I think it was all three (Putin, Comey and Kasich) that contributed to HRC's "loss", and that if any of the three had not occurred HRC would be president.

Although, IMO it was Kobach that had the greatest impact. I might be wrong, but I do think that in ANY discussion of how the 2016 POTUS election was stolen, Kobach should definitely be included. Along with Putin and Comey. They were all BIG factors that point to the election being stolen.

Regarding Mohajer writing that "courts must use the broad discretionary powers with which they are vested to enjoin an illegitimate president from taking office"... I wish. But that's not going to happen, unfortunately.

I mean, gwb took office after the scotus appointed him over the rightful winner, Al Gore. Gore being another Democrat who was elected but did not serve. Election results are never reversed. Republicans know this, which is why any cheating they can pull off is "fair" as far as they are concerned.

DSB #64